Wong Halves is the most precise of the widely used counts. It weights each card by how much it really changes the player's edge, which means half-point tags. It is accurate and demanding: a system for players who already count without mistakes.
| Level | 3 (tags from −1 to +1½) |
|---|---|
| Balanced | Yes. A full deck counts to 0 |
| True count needed | Yes |
| Betting correlation | 0.99 |
| Playing efficiency | 0.56 |
| Insurance correlation | 0.72 |
| Cards | Tag | Doubled |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | +1½ | +3 |
| 3 · 4 · 6 | +1 | +2 |
| 2 · 7 | +½ | +1 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | −½ | −1 |
| 10 · J · Q · K · A | −1 | −2 |
The 5 matters most: removing it helps the player more than any other card, so it gets the biggest tag.
| Card | Tag | Running count | Doubled count |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | +1½ | +1½ | +3 |
| 2 | +½ | +2 | +4 |
| K | −1 | +1 | +2 |
| 9 | −½ | +½ | +1 |
| 7 | +½ | +1 | +2 |
| 3 | +1 | +2 | +4 |
Most Wong Halves players count with the doubled tags so there are no fractions, then halve the result when they convert to a true count. A doubled running count of +4 is a Wong Halves count of +2.
Divide the running count by decks remaining, as with Hi-Lo. If you count doubled, divide by decks remaining and then by 2. The true count calculator has a Wong Halves setting that uses its slightly higher edge gain per true count point.
Its betting correlation of 0.99 against Hi-Lo's 0.97 is a real but small gain. See how all seven systems compare on the systems page.
Stanford Wong published the Halves count in Professional Blackjack (1975), the same book that made Hi-Lo the standard count.
Counting Edge counts Wong Halves for you as you tap cards, converts to the true count, and runs timed drills so you can check your own count. Free and open source.
Download APK — Free